[Towertalk] NYS PRB-1 Needs Your Help Now!
Michael Tope
W4EF@dellroy.com
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 20:56:31 -0700
I suspect Gov. Davis got a big contribution from the Homeowners
Association lobby group. Mr. Davis is very effective at raising lots
of money for his political campaigns (he has a $30 to 40 million dollar
campaign war chest). If only he were as good at running the state.
California is now about 20 billion in debt after running a budget
surplus when the governor took office).
BTW, you could probably buy his mother and children if the check
was big enough.
73 de Mike, W4EF/6........................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Farkaly" <bob@farkaly.com>
To: "Herbert Sweet" <k2gbh@arrl.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] NYS PRB-1 Needs Your Help Now!
> Both houses of the California legislature passed a California version of
> PRB-1, only to have it vetoed by Gray Davis. Gov Davis said ham antennas
> were purely a local issue.
>
> Good luck in NY.
>
> Bob, K9RHY
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herbert Sweet" <k2gbh@arrl.net>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 7:49 AM
> Subject: [Towertalk] NYS PRB-1 Needs Your Help Now!
>
>
> > ROM:
> >
> > Bernie Fuller N3EFN - Atlantic Division Director
> > and
> > Frank Fallon N2FF - Hudson Division Director
> >
> > Last Ditch Effort Needed on Tower Bill - June 28, 2002
> >
> > We thought it would all be over by now. It is not. Although the Senate
> >
> > passed S 2893 over a week ago in a 49 to 19 vote, the Assembly still has
> >
> > not acted on the bill. We have been attempting behind the scenes to
> > overcome the opposition to the bill from the local government lobby -
> > the Association of Town and the New York Council of Mayors and Municipal
> >
> > Officials - who see this bill as an erosion of their ability to control
> > our antennas. They erroneously claim it is a home rule issue. They
> > claim that they continue to need to "balance the issues" in Amateur
> > antenna applications. They refuse to recognize that the FCC took it up
> > itself to do the balancing almost seventeen years ago when it issued
> > PRB-1. NYCOM is either lying or badly distorting the facts here. Since
> >
> > they were not successful in stopping the bill in the Senate they
> > appear
> > to have pulled out all the stops in lobbying the Assembly. We need to
> > counteract them with letters, faxes, e-mails and phone calls. We are
> > not happy to have to ask you to once again help but there seems to be no
> >
> > other way.
> >
> > After discussion with our sponsor, and upon his advice, we are appealing
> >
> > to you to help get this bill passed this year. There will be no better
> > opportunity than 2002 to get it done. Please personalize the two
> > letters attached and send copies to Speaker Silver, our co sponsors and
> > your own assembly representative as soon as possible. If you know any
> > of the members of the Rules Committee you might want to write them also.
> >
> > That information is available at http://www.assembly.state.ny.us
> >
> > Currently the assembly is not in session but we expect them to return
> > either Tuesday, July 2, or the following week - July 9th for a day or
> > two of sessions. Speaker Silver will determine when they return and for
> >
> > how long. We need to act immediately.
> >
> > Write Assemblyman Sheldon Silver, LOB 932, Albany, NY 12248. Telephone
> >
> > 518-455-3791 and fax 518-455-5459. Email speaker@assembly.state.ny.us
> >
> > Get your relatives, friends and neighbors to do the same. Tell your
> > legislators about our long proud history of public service.
> > Write-Phone-FAX-E-mail. Check http://www.hudson.arrl.org
> >
> > Here is a sample letter to send to speaker Silver. Please personalize it
> >
> > and send it.
> >
> >
> > June 27, 2002
> > Speaker Sheldon Silver
> > New York State Assembly
> > 932 LOB
> > Albany, NY 12248 Re: A. 1565 Tocci
> >
> > Dear Speaker Silver,
> >
> > The Senate understood our Amateur Radio antenna bill was non
> > controversial and did not limit local government when they passed their
> > version (S.2893) by a vote of 49 to 19 over a week ago. They clearly
> > understood this is not a home rule issue for since 1985 federal law has
> > taken away local government power to balance and directed local
> > government to accommodate our antennas with the least regulation
> > possible. They were not swayed by and saw through the lobbying effort
> > of the Association of Towns and NYCOM. The Senate realized that our
> > self limiting legislation was the way to insure a continued pool of
> > unpaid self trained communications volunteers in a time of need such
> > as
> > 9/11. Over 800 ham operators worked for more than two weeks without pay
> >
> > during the 9/11 response. As the governor has repeatedly told us that
> > he will sign the legislation, we need you to allow the Assembly to do
> > the right thing and vote the bill. Please assign it a calendar number
> > and send it to the floor of the Assembly before the current session
> > ends.
> >
> > We need this law ONLY because local governments refuse to accept the
> > federal law that gives hams the right to erect these support structures.
> >
> > Local government erroneously believes that this is a "home rule" issue;
> >
> > they feel they still have the right to engage in the " balancing of
> > interests." Federal law has unquestionably preempted local
> > law with respect to the balancing. Most local governments "just don't
> > get it." That's why we need this law. Hams don't need to spend lots of
> >
> > money on legal fees to achieve their goals; they need this law.
> > Please
> > remember that hams provide their services FREE OF CHARGE. Local, state
> > and federal government and the citizens of our beloved country are the
> > benefactors of their work when disaster strikes.
> >
> > Please ignore the selfish criticism from NYCOMM and the Association of
> > Towns or any other "home rule" people; they are simply spouting a knee
> > jerk reaction to what they feel is loss of local control. But they have
> >
> > already lost local control because the Federal government preempted
> > them
> > with the issuance of PRB-1. This is simply "sour grapes."
> >
> > Hams are very angry that the selfish local government lobby simply
> > ignores all the good we have done over so many years and lies about
> > power being taken from them.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Your name (Amateur Call) ..........
> >
> > The co-sponsors of A 1565 are: (Please note only two of them use
> > e-mail - Fax machines may be off at night)
> >
> > Assemblyman Paul Tonko, 713 LOB, Albany, NY 12248, telephone
> > 518-455-5197, fax 518-455-5435, email tonkop@asembly.state.ny.us
> >
> > Assemblyman Steve Levy, 827 LOB, Albany, NY 12248, telephone
> > 518-455-5937, fax 518-455-4784, email - none
> >
> > Assemblyman Robin Schimminger, 847 LOB, Albany, NY 12248, telephone
> > 518-455-4767, fax 518-455-4724, email schimmr@assembly.state.ny.us
> >
> > Assemblyman Richard Smith, 619 LOB, Albany, NY 12248, telephone
> > 518-455-4462, fax 518-455-5560, email -none
> >
> > Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg, 731 LOB, Albany, NY 12248, telephone
> > 518-455-3028, fax 518-455-5769, email - none
> >
> > To our cosponsors and your own representative to the Assembly send the
> > following letter:
> >
> > June 24, 2002
> >
> > Assemblyman Paul Tonko
> > New York State Assembly
> > 713 LOB
> > Albany, NY 12248 Re: A. 1565
> >
> > Dear Assemblyman Tonko,
> >
> > I have been watching the assembly video site checking progress of our
> > Amateur Radio Antenna bill that Ron Tocci is sponsoring and which you
> > have co-sponsored. Many New York hams are following the video when the
> > session is taking place hoping to see A.1565 voted.
> >
> > Please help us by helping Ron get this bill to the assembly floor for a
> > vote before the session ends. The bill was passed in the Senate - S
> > 2893 a week ago. I am amazed that the Assembly has not yet acted.
> >
> > We need this law ONLY because local governments refuse to accept the
> > federal law that gives hams the right to erect these support structures.
> >
> > Local government erroneously believes that this is a "home rule" issue;
> >
> > they feel they still have the right to engage in the " balancing of
> > interests." Federal law has unquestionably preempted local law with
> > respect to the balancing. Most local governments "just don't get it."
> > That's why we need this law. Hams don't need to spend lots of money on
> > legal fees to achieve their goals; they need this law. Remember, hams
> > provide their services FREE OF CHARGE. Local, state and federal
> > government and the citizens of our beloved country are the benefactors
> > of their work when disaster strikes.
> >
> > Please ignore any criticism from NYCOMM and the Association of Towns and
> >
> > any other "home rule" people; they are simply spouting a knee jerk
> > reaction to what they feel is loss of local control. But they have
> > already lost local control because the Federal government preempted them
> >
> > with the issuance of PRB-1. This is simply "sour grapes."
> >
> > Many hams are very angry that the local government lobby simply ignores
> > all the good we have done over so many years. We can't believe how soon
> >
> > they forget our volunteer efforts after the 9/11 attack.
> >
> > Many thanks for cosponsoring the bill and getting it this far. We hope
> > that you and Ron will be able to give it that last important push this
> > week.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Your name (call sign)
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ARRL Eastern New York Section
> > Section Manager: Peter A. Cecere, N2YJZ
> > n2yjz@arrl.org
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message is being sent to you via the ARRL Members Only Web site.
> > If you do not want to receive further messages, go to the site at:
> > http://www.arrl.org/members-only/memdata.html?modify=1
> > Log in with your username and password and change your email options.
> > Unchecking the "Division/Section notices" box will prevent messages
> > such as this one from being sent to you.
> > -- webmaster@arrl.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Towertalk mailing list
> > Towertalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>