[Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy?

n4kg@juno.com n4kg@juno.com
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:55:27 -0600


On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 10:49:00 -0800 Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca> writes:
> When I put something bigger up I will probably steady the top of the 
> tower with 4 dacron guys, whether or not I add 5 more ft of Rohn.  

	Good idea.

> Why 5  ft?  I have a 5 ft section lying on the roof deck.  
> Why 4 guys?   Because 
> I can get better placement of the guys with 4 than with 3.

	Sounds reasonable.
> 
> Anyway, I figure the smaller antenna will put less stress on the 
> somewhat unconventionally installed tower.

	True.
> 
> Someone suggested forget the antenna and get an amp.  

	An amp will give you more gain than a beam.
	400/100W = 6 dB   800/100W = 9 dB  
	1000/100W = 10 dB   1600 / 100W = 12 dB

> With an  antenna  I'll hear better.  

	Maybe, maybe not.  I've worked over 320 countries
	on each of the WARC bands using dipoles and
	up to 800W.

> With an amp I won't.  Also, TVI around here is  barely 
> under control.  Not sure I can get away with using an amp.  

	QSL. That can be a problem.

> Plus, I  still wouldn't have the presence on 40 that a 2 el beam 
> will give  me.

	A 'shortie 40' might have 3 dB gain over a dipole.
	I worked my first 300 countries on 40M using
	rotary dipoles at 80 ft (and an SB220).
> 
> One major item is the need for something decent on 40 that I can 
> erect. 

	A rotary dipole is a very effective 40M antenna.

	Tom  N4KG



________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.