[TowerTalk] RE: [DX] ARRL BPL Video
WYsixK
wy6k at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 7 12:16:34 EDT 2003
How do we make comments to the FCC? Enail or written? Addressee and
address?
--- Danny Douglas <ddouglas at gcc.vccs.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Pretty much what I expected when I first heard of BPL. Having worked
> in
> so-called "RF free" rooms, and having heard my own computer equipment
> getting into the HF equipment being tested there, It is no supprise
> to hear
> the high level inteference coming through. The higher the data
> rate,( I.E.
> more users) the higher the interference we can expect.
>
> I will be commenting, to the FCC, on this system. In that comment I
> will
> also advise them that if I hear any inteference from a BPL system, I
> will
> immediately be contacting them for relief under part 9 rules. With
> no
> satisfaction from that, I am more than willing to participate in
> legal
> action against the provider and users of the BPL and against the FCC
> for
> approving such a system that they know will intefere with HF
> communications.
> There is no justification of any kind for approval of construction or
> installation of equipment which would cause inteference problems to
> other
> services from which they have over-sight responsibilities.
>
> I urge each reader to send their comments, on this matter, to the
> FCC, and
> to enlist any other HF users to do so. That would, of course, CB
> clubs,
> your local law enforcement, fire and emergency squads, governtmental
> agencies etc. As it will intefere with every one of those systems
> that use
> HF.
>
> If we have ever need to fight a battle, it is right now.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DX mailing list
> DX at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list