[TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Fri Sep 12 10:10:40 EDT 2003
At 10:37 AM 9/12/2003 -0400, Rex Lint wrote:
>john,
>
>I don't follow you.
>
>"One cannot dispute mathematics. Gain is a product
>of Boom Length."
>
>The boom length of a TH7 is 24 feet. The boom length of a C-31XR is 31 feet.
>Therefore, the C-31XR is the better performer according to your mathematics,
>isn't it?
>
>Rex
>K1HI
A more rigorous statement (fully defensible as laws of physics) might be:
The maximum achievable gain (not directivity) is a function of physical
size, and all other factors being equal, larger physical size means larger
gain.
However, such a statement isn't worth much, other than as a general,
"there's no substitute for height and size" kind of argument..
John's original statement would be better stated as "In general, longer
booms allow designs with more gain, without sacrificing other performance
parameters."
Jim, W6RMK
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list