[TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk

[RICHARD BOYD]

Absolutely.  I agree.  There are many, many who are fine with their callsign 
including extras who have opted to keep their original callsign.  73 - Rich, 
KE3Q


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Cqtestk4xs at aol.com>
To: <TOWERTALK at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk


> >Reasons I can think of why someone would not want to:
> >1.   embarrassed to have a 2X3 callsign (as an example), among 1X2 and 
> >2X1
> >guys.  I don't mean this as an insult; I personally know some guys, 
> >friends
> >of mine, who feel this way about their callsign.
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> KB9CRY doesnt have a problem with posting...I read his stuff regularly, 
> and
> take his thoughts more seriously than lots of 1 X 2 calls.
>
> Bill K4XS
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with 
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>