[TowerTalk] Why Rain static is worse on the top antenna. [was Quad vs SteppIR]

Guy Olinger, K2AV olinger at bellsouth.net
Mon Aug 30 22:48:20 EDT 2004


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "david jordan" <wa3gin at erols.com>

> Noise from point source such as a tower or building and 
> percepitation static created when dropplets of rain or snow flakes 
> that are charged come in contact with the elements of a bare wire or 
> beam antenna.

I would respectfully disagree.

It is more likely that less charged raindrops come in contact with the 
highly charged antenna or wire.

A. It is well known that a substantial opposite charge on the ground 
follows the charge in the clouds overhead.

B. It is also well known that a capacitor consisting of two plates 
will collect the highest density of charge on the surfaces of the two 
plates facing one another.

C. A yagi at the top of the tower will intercept a lot less than one 
percent of the rain falling through it's turning radius.

D. The yagi below it will get just as wet, since the yagi above is 
about as effective a rain shield as an umbrella that's lost all its 
fabric. Or stated another way, which one of you runs out to the tower 
under the yagis to get out of the rain.

Given C. and D., if the rain was charged and both yagis were neutral, 
connected to ground, the lower yagi should be just as noisy as the 
yagi above. But that can't be true, since the "shield effect" is well 
documented.

Try the charge on the ground, from A., and the rain quite less charged 
(more neutral).

Since the tower and the yagi's are connected to ground, the tower 
complex assumes at least the ground charge. From B., the top yagi 
functions like the surface of the capacitor plate, assuming nearly all 
of the ground charge available to the tower, because it's closer to 
the clouds.

The neutral rain hits the high charge top yagi and the movement of the 
charge making the drop equal to the yagi causes the noise.

The neutral rain hitting the neutral lower yagi does nothing.

Exaggerated, of course, but you get the point.

The difficulty in seeing the ground/tower as highly charged, is that 
the AREA or NEIGHBORHOOD is at an elevated charge underneath the 
charged clouds overhead.

In thinking about what might be noisy or quiet in a tower/antenna 
complex, consider whether 1) there is some thing extensive and 
grounded above it, or if to the side a bit, is there an upward moving 
path from the TOP of something to something else substantial and 
higher yet.

73, y'all

Guy.






More information about the TowerTalk mailing list