[TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification
Richard M. Gillingham
rmoodyg at bellsouth.net
Thu Jul 22 08:38:47 EDT 2004
Seems to me that this section, 3A.04.B.ii, specifically exempts amateur
installations of any height less than 70 feet from the rest of the article.
It includes tower and antenna. I don't know what the rest of the ordinance
states, so exceeding the 70 feet may be possible or not.
Good luck. Hope your endeavors grow and grow. (grin)
Gil, W1RG
IANAL....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan AB2OS" <ab2os at att.net>
To: "towertalk reflector" <towertalk at contesting.com>
Cc: <smeuse at mara.org>; <jimjarvis at ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:20 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification
> The wording in my original message was my own. The relevant section of
> the ordinance is:
>
> "Sec. 3A.04 Applicability.
> A. New towers and antennas. All new towers and new antennas in the
> township shall be subject to this article, except as otherwise provided
> in this section.
> B. Amateur radio station operators/receive only antennas; television
> antennas. This article shall not govern any tower, or the installation
> of any antenna:
> (i) That is under seventy (70) feet in height; and
> (ii) Is owned and operated by a federally-licensed amateur radio
> station or is used exclusively for receive only antennas for voice or
> television reception."
>
> I take this to mean that no part of the installation may be more than
> 70' above grade.
>
> Alan AB2OS
>
>
> On 07/21/04 11:48 pm Jim Jarvis put fingers to keyboard and launched the
> following message into cyberspace:
>
> > I obviously missed the central point of this post,
> > and responded to mast vs. tower cost/weight discussion.
> >
> > There MAY be a subtlety in the ordinance language, regarding
> > 'antenna support' or 'tower' as distinct from antenna. This
> > may give you wiggle room. Worth careful investigation.
> >
> > As a practical matter, I'd suggest putting up the 70 foot tower,
> > with the steppIR on it. You can EITHER let it grow a bit, for
> > 2m yagi spacing, or co-locate the 2m yagi on the steppir boom....
> > or not much above it. You don't need 10' spacing. You DO need to
> > get the yagi 20m above ground, for it to be effective for long
> > distance work on 20m.
> >
> > Again, practically speaking, if you're an experimenter, the
> > zoning folks don't want to regulate "antennas"...merely the
> > support structure. What goes on top is both irrelevant, and may
> > change with some frequency. If you have decent relations with the
> > professional staff, (city planner, zoning administrator) they may
> > be able to give you useful guidance here.
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list