[TowerTalk] CC&Rs
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Thu Mar 25 09:44:23 EST 2004
At 12:09 PM 3/25/2004 -0500, Alan Beagley wrote:
>Just out of curiosity (since the legal advice I received assured me
>that the CC&Rs relating to my home do not outlaw antennas and towers):
>
>I know that attempts are being made in various States to have PRB-1 apply
>to properties subject to Homeowners' Associations. But what about
>properties with "Restrictive Covenants," CC&Rs, etc. that outlaw antennas
>and "run with the land" and are therefore technically enforceable (by whom
>I am not sure -- by the courts at the instigation of one's neigbors?) even
>in the absence of a Homeowners' Association? Have the attempts to widen
>the scope of PRB-1 dealt with this situation?
>
>Alan AB2OS
>_
Even if the homeowner's association or contractor that was originally
responsible for the creation of the CC&Rs has gone away (bankrupt, etc.),
any homeowner in the subdivision/tract/organization can probably sue to
enforce the CC&Rs. (I am aware of at least one case where this happened
recently) Whether some random person could sue, I don't know. It's all
that funny thing of "standing". It would probably be difficult to enforce
any provisions of the rules (which are separate from the CC&Rs, but the
existence of which is usually mandated by the CC&Rs) that require paying
fines or fees (who would you pay them to, if the organization has gone away?).
By the way, not to rain on your parade, but there's nothing keeping an HOA
board from making a rule prohibiting antennas at any time, even if the
CC&Rs don't say anything about it, because, generally, the CC&Rs contain
provisions allowing the board to do just that.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list