[TowerTalk] collapsing steppIR elements
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Fri May 7 14:36:19 EDT 2004
At 04:19 PM 5/7/2004 +0000, Jim Jarvis wrote:
>Interesting idea, to attach the tape to the tips of
>the nesting fiberglass tubes. Couple of problems with that, though.
>
>First, it wouldn't be as well weather sealed. Second,
>although the telescoping fiberglass WOULD go in and out,
>it's shaped and surfaced to grip when it's all the way out.
>That would need to be changed.
>
>Finally, 'homing' the steppIR motor would require a non-zero
>definition, and some way to index at the inboard stop.
What's the performance impact of using tape vs just running a wire? Sure,
the RF resistance of a flat conductor is lower, but compare that to several
parallel wires?
Once one has separated the "actuator" from the "conductor" there's lots of
approaches. If one had telescoping tubes (with rudimentary seals, one
could use air pressure to extend and retract them (assuming you can keep
them clean enough), you could have a simple wire(s) fed from a springloaded
spool.
There are a number of clever structures that deploy by twisting one part
relative to another. Not all of them are as complex as, e.g., the 60 meter
mast on the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission.
There's also the accordion folding thing like used to hold a shaving mirror
out from a wall: a series of links in X's. (imagine a stack of automotive
scissor jacks) You drive the center X with a lead screw and all the rest
follow. It's self balancing, but might be quite heavy.
There's also deployable structures like the Hoberman sphere and some of
Snelson's tensegrity structures.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list