[TowerTalk] Re: Topband: RX antennas

GALE STEWARD k3nd at yahoo.com
Tue May 11 11:47:02 EDT 2004


Hi Roger,
How low is low? 10ft, 50ft, other? I'm thinking of
trying one and wonder what worked best for you.

73, Stew K3ND


--- Roger Parsons <ve3zi at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have consistently found that a low 160m dipole
> will
> _sometimes_ be the best receive antenna, and would
> expect an 80m or 40m dipole to behave in a similar
> way. This is true here with 12 beverages and was
> true
> from G3RBP with 5 beverages. Both of these locations
> were/are electrically quiet, and I would emphasise
> that this happens only for a small percentage of the
> time.
> 
> I could never find any correlation in England, but
> here I note that the dipole is usually better during
> periods of high geomagnetic activity, and I presume
> that high angles predominate at that time. It is not
> however often helpful that I can hear well when my
> transmit signals are being more or less totally
> absorbed!
> 
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
>
____________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
> your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs  
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list