[TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporting tower
Chris Pedder
chris at g3vbl.co.uk
Sat Apr 9 11:24:28 EDT 2005
At 16:47 09/04/2005, K8LX wrote:
>If you look at the numbers, the increase in
>downward force is insignificant, compared to leg strength and
>to what the down-wind leg experiences in the un-guyed state.
>
>Steve K8LX
Sense at last. I note the periodic return to this topic initially with
amusement, but eventually with annoyance. There is a prejudice on the
reflector against crank-up towers and some of this rubs off on
self-supporting towers..... after all it isn't guyed Rohn 25/45/55 so it
cannot be right.
To suggest that a sensibly guyed 'self-supporting' tower is less safe than
without the guys is risible......(as I said in my post of 18 April 2003!)
Chris
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list