rant on "mil spec" wasRE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] RG-11 Source?

[Keith Dutson]

Jim,
>However, for some things, you might not want the mil-spec product: perhaps
non-mil-spec Charmin might provide a better toilet tissue experience than
ASTM D3905 compliant stuff?) 

LOL!

I prefer Scott. <grin>

Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lux
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:51 PM
To: TowerTalk at contesting.com
Subject: rant on "mil spec" wasRE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] RG-11 Source?

At 09:19 AM 2/9/2005, Steve Katz wrote:

>Tower Talkians,
>
>Anyone have a good source for quality RG-11?
>
>::I have mil-spec RG11/U on spools.  How much do you need?

I don't want to beat up on Steve here, but he triggered an area near and
dear to my everyday work.
Just a quibble here about the term mil-spec... (a similar phenomenon occurs
with high rel electronic parts, except there, it's with reference to 883B,
Class S, etc.)
[snip]