[TowerTalk] 4square/spitfire alternative
Pete Smith
n4zr at contesting.com
Tue Feb 22 21:51:44 EST 2005
At 09:30 AM 2/22/2005, Jim Jarvis wrote:
>The unanswered question, though, is CAN THIS BE DONE USING
>MONOPOLES FED AGAINST GROUND, USING THE SAME FEEDLINE SCHEME?
>I think it's a worthy experiment, but needs to be modelled
>for spacing. I suspect a 1/4 wave element spacing with a
>3/8 wave feedline might work ok, based on the typical cardoid
>pattern which derives from 90 degree spacing fed 90 degrees
>out.
Interesting idea, Jim. I think, though, that you're mixing two feed
schemes. This arrangement is not all-driven, but rather a variation on the
Yagi-Uda parasitic concept. The feedline's length is only important
insofar as how much equivalent inductance (and loss) it adds to the center
of the parasitic elements, when the feeders for the non-driven elements are
left open-circuit. It would be simple enough to model the scheme you
describe, either using transmission lines or (preferably) using lumped R
and Xl values derived from the feedlines used. I expect that the spacing
would be quite non-critical.
73, Pete N4ZR
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list