[TowerTalk] Tower Conundrum

Dave NØRQ n0rq-lists at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jan 14 13:25:53 EST 2005


Well, curious.  The picture still shows 8 sections, 8 feet each,
for a 64' tower.

I'm going to take a guess and suggest that  perhaps Trylon decided
to do something about the fact that their 64' tower is really only
about 62' (due to overlap where sections join) -- and they now
throw in an inexpensive mast.  I would call that a change probably
required by their legal dept.

Bottom line is that even not counting the "pipe", their towers are
*almost* as tall as their model#/specs say.  They still remain a
very reasonable choice, competition from the worthy ANW
line notwithstanding.

73,
Dave NØRQ



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a at att.net>
>
> http://www.trylon.com/lightdutytowers/selfsupporttwrs_pricing.asp
>
...
> Tower height shown is nominal. Actual tower height achieved utilizing 
> support pipe provided with tower."
>
> Note the last paragraph.
>
> Alan NV8A



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list