[TowerTalk] 80m dipole question

WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA wa3gin at erols.com
Sat Nov 19 13:13:14 EST 2005


At height he is using it's a NVIS antenna...a few feet of droopy
elements isn't going to make a noticeable difference in his short skip
performance.

73,
dave
wa3gin


-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jan Erik Holm
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 12:50 PM
Cc: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question

The whole antenna is importand, don´t forget ground losses.
Back in the 60:ties people was thinking that a Inv V was
better then a dipole, atleast I know better know!

73 Jim
---------

WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA wrote:

> That dropping concept in reality works fine.  Most of the radiating
work
> is done much closer to the feed point, the first 1/8 wave of wire
either
> side of the feed point.
> 
> 73,
> dave
> wa3gin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of A.J. Farmer
> (AJ3U)
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 12:14 PM
> To: Travis Fitzgerald - VE3WO
> Cc: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question
> 
> The "flattened V" is okay.  It does not have to be perfectly
> horizontal all the way across.  Mine does the same thing with a droop
> of about 6 to 10 feet in the center and it works fine.  I have even
> heard some recommend this type of droop.
> 
> The other thing you could consider is to attach your insulators to the
> dipole a little further in towards the center and let the end slack
> droop down vertically like this:
> 
> -------x--------
> |               |
> 
> Good luck in the contest!!
> 
> --
> A.J. Farmer, AJ3U
> http://www.aj3u.com
> 
> 
> On 11/19/05, Travis Fitzgerald - VE3WO <ve3wo at rac.ca> wrote:
> 
>>Anyone on the reflector this morning?  I'm having a small problem with
> 
> an 80m dipole that I'm raising for CQWW next weekend.  Total length of
> the dipole is 133', but distance from tower to house is about 125'
> (didn't know I was short until I tried to raise it).  If I raise the
> dipole until it reaches the house, the dipole resembles a flattened
"V",
> with the feedpoint at about 25'.  Tower end is at 60', house end at
35'.
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
"Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041
with
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
"Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk




More information about the TowerTalk mailing list