[TowerTalk] AS-AYL-4 4 direction Low Band Receiving Antenna

Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.net
Mon Dec 18 19:24:49 EST 2006


At 02:48 PM 12/18/2006, Rick Karlquist wrote:
><snip>
>
>There are several thousands of ohms of capactive reactance,
>depending on the frequency.  The transformer does not tune
>this out or or in any way provide a conjugate match.  The
>optimum transformer ratio occurs when the resistive load
>presented to the antenna equals the magnitude of the capacitive
>reactance.  However, you can be off by a factor of 3 or 4
>either way with only a few dB of lost sensitivity.  The loss
>of sensitivity is not a real loss in what you can receive,
>it just means you will need a few more dB of gain in your
>preamp.  The preamp is a plain 50 ohm to 50 ohm or 75 ohm
>to 75 ohm amplifier.  It can be preceded by an ordinary BCB
>rejection filter if necessary.  You cannot precede the DXE
>amplifier with a filter.  Another reason not to use it.


Indeed.. I was fooling with some active antennas recently, and found 
that local EMI sources just hammered the amplifiers.  One of the 
advantages of a receive array is nulling out the noise, and if the 
noise saturates the amplfier, no amount of clever phasing is going to help.

Unless you're in a quiet location (out on a field somewhere?) and 
have "real good" preamps with lots and lots of headroom, I think you 
definitely need some selectivity in front of the amps.

I haven't thought about it at great length, but I wonder if you could 
come up with a simple passive network that could be put at the base 
of a several meter long whip (or loop) with the transformer that 
would provide enough selectivity to restrict you to just a ham 
band.  It might be that a single low Q LC might do it? (500 kHz BW at 
3.5 MHz is a Q of 7), but it might be a couple sections... You need 
to suppress things like BCB only a few bandwidths away (and broadband 
power line noise)

(a tuned loop has plenty of selectivity, but then you have all the 
tuning issues.. although, perhaps, a varactor?)
(or, for a high complexity approach.. something like the stepper 
motor driven variable L in the new transceivers)

Although, a small stepper and a small variable C or L might not be 
that hard to cobble up.  You could certainly move it as fast as you 
can "spin the dial" on your radio.


Jim, W6RMK




More information about the TowerTalk mailing list