[TowerTalk] Action against US Tower?
aa4lr at arrl.net
Fri Jun 9 22:17:30 EDT 2006
On Jun 6, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Van K7VS wrote:
> In the mid-seventies Cessna, Piper and others simply stopped
> small planes for private use until they finally lobbied the
> government and
> stopped all the foolish law suits and their liability because of
> the problem
> associated with primarily Pilot error.
Uh, this is not correct on many levels.
First of all, although Cessna ceased production of piston-powered
aircraft in 1986, Piper aircraft continued to produce them. Or, at
least they tried. Many other small aircraft manufacturers also tried.
However, it was a difficult business proposition.
The key issue was the continuing liability trailer for all the
aircraft ever manufactured. Aircraft are not like automobiles -- they
see continuing maintenance and will last for decades. Manufacturers
needed to insure themselves every one of these existing aircraft.
The liability is formidable partly because of the concept of joint
and severable liability. Attourneys would argue that the manufacturer
had some negligence because they allowed something stupid to happen.
So, if the juries were convinced that the Manufacturer had even 1%
liability, they'd end up paying for it all, since their pockets were
The Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996 fixed this by limiting the
Manufacturer's liability for an aircraft (or any part) to 18 years.
Overnight, Piper aircraft, which had been in and out of bankruptcy
for years, suddenly became a going concern - investors immediately
came forward to bail them out.
Cessna aircraft immediately started to build a new plant. They have
been producing piston-powered single engine aircraft since 1997.
Frankly, the way that the Manufacturer's liability works has been
broken in this country for years. We've all been paying again and
again for people who have been lucky enough to prove culpability
where there probably is none. We've made it an environment where
manufacturers hesitate to improve the safety of their products for
fear such improvements will be seen as an admission that their
previous products were defective.
The Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996 was a good move, for both
manufacturers and consumers.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
More information about the TowerTalk