[TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ?

Bob Nielsen n7xy at clearwire.net
Fri Aug 3 11:27:02 EDT 2007


On Aug 2, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Dan Zimmerman N3OX wrote:

> What can I expect as far as variation in cable quality at UHF if I buy
> RG-6 at Home Depot or Lowes or Circuit City?
>
> I need a 35-40' run of something with less loss than RG-58 by Saturday
> to play around with a new antenna I built in the UHF contest, and it
> seems like RG-6 could be sufficient (about 1.5dB loss in 35 feet
> according to VK1OD's line calculator).
>
> I wonder if those who have more experience using it know if something
> like 4.3dB/100ft is the best case for a good RG-6, or more like the
> "normal" loss for commodity RG-6, and if it's the former, do you have
> any ideas for local sources for *good* cable?
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Dan
> _______________________________________________

I haven't used RG-6 much for ham applications, but have hundreds of  
feet installed for satellite TV here.  There are several reputable  
brands, such as Belden, Commscope, etc., but a lot of junk also.   
Satellite applications go much higher in frequency than cable TV and  
you might look for cable which has been sweep-tested (often up to 3  
GHz).  Connectors are also important.  I recommend using compression  
connectors, rather than crimp.  These are water-resistant and don't  
deform the cable when making a termination. Thomas & Betts Snap-N- 
Seal is a good brand and have BNC as well as the usual F-type  
connectors.

I found some fairly decent cable (I don't recall the brand) and  
DataShark connectors and compression tool at my local Home Depot.

73, Bob N7XY


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list