[TowerTalk] Ask the experts

Dick, W1KSZ w1ksz at earthlink.net
Fri Jul 6 18:06:01 EDT 2007


This "Mosley Bashing" has finally hit my button !!
I have a PRO-57A and am very satisfied with it. It
is my understanding that subsequent models were
"improved". I have not seen any published data from
verifiable sources except those peddling their
"comparisons" which I don't intend to pay for.

Not every ham has the real estate to put up Mono-
Banders on Sky-Needles, so, as it is in life, one
must make compromises. But I cannot accept that the
PRO-57A is that bad, not without proof.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

gdaught6 at stanford.edu wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2007 at 22:07, Bob Good wrote:
> 
>> Gents,  I have seen several poor opinions of the Mosley "Pro Series" beams, 
>> in particular the Pro - 67...    I have a very old Pro 57A at 70 feet that 
>> was used when I put it up  in 1999.  I run a max of 500 watts in the pileups 
>> and find my experences with the "57A" very satisfactory.  Please tell me if 
>> I am missing out on what I should expect from a "good" beam OR is there a 
>> difference in the performance of my antenna verses the others mentioned?  I 
>> would appreciate your comments.  Thanks.  Regards,  Bob K4BG 
> 
> Nobody said it doesn't work.  In fact, as Tom Schiller pointed out in 
> his (fairly) recent QST article, "Everything works!"  In a careful  
> comparison the Moseley Pro came out poorly against the competition.  
> You can read all about it in the report prepared by K7LXC and N0AX.  
> You MAY indeed be missing out on better performance, although I don't 
> recall whether Steve and Ward tested the 57A.
> 
> 73,
> 
> George T. Daughters, K6GT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

-- 
73, Dick, W1KSZ


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list