[TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters

[Jim McLaughlin]

Dave,

Maybe if possible just forget him. You've seen him do that before and he 
will again. He is just one of those 'self proclaimed' experts who will 
always have either more or better data then anybody else. You will never 
hear him admit that he is wrong and it will be an endless battle and not 
worth your  effort.

Jim-    WA9FPT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid at cis-broadband.com>
To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk at contesting.com>; "Jim Brown" 
<jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters


>
> I don't get it.  That's going to generate several thousand documents to
> wade through, most of which won't address your claim.  Why come back
> with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have the
> references?  I think you just make this junk up and then try to bully
> your way through the responses.
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> jeremy-ca wrote:
>>>> BC band engineers have proven that an elevated
>>>> system delivers the same field strength OR BETTER than a classic 128
>>>> buried radials at the same site.
>>>>
>>> Perhaps you might cite the specific references in the literature that
>>> say that. The ones I've read don't say that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I guess you can find them the same way I did; try Google. I'll even give 
>> you
>> a couple of key words to assist. Elevated Radials; Unipole; Folded 
>> Unipole;
>> Broadcast Antennas to name a few.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Jim Brown K9YC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk