[TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
Gary Schafer
garyschafer at comcast.net
Fri Sep 7 23:13:55 EDT 2007
If it is 1.2:1 at the shack it is also 1.2:1 at the antenna. The impedance
may be transformed but the swr will not be.
73
Gary K4FMX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jarvis [mailto:jimjarvis at optonline.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:10 PM
> To: Gary Schafer; towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
>
>
> Well, yes, Gary, that's true.
>
> But suppose it's 1.2:1? is that because it's 1.2:1 at the
> antenna, or because whatever wierd impedance is presented at the
> feedpoint is transformed to something close to r50 j0?
>
> Jim/n2ea
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Schafer [mailto:garyschafer at comcast.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 11:00 PM
> To: 'Jim Jarvis'; towertalk at contesting.com; areidmaertz at sio.midco.net
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > A half wave, more or less in the clear, will radiate
> > just fine. What you measure as vswr at the shack end of
> > the feedline reflects impedance transformation in the
> > transmission line. Seeing 1:1 at the end of 500' of line
> > doesn't tell you a damned thing about the antenna match,
> > or system loss. Nor does 8:1, although that surely raises
> > questions about what's wrong.
>
> Seeing 1:1 swr at the shack means that the swr at the antenna is also 1:1
> (provided you don't have excessive feedline loss). Swr will be the same
> anywhere on the line.
>
> 73
> Gary K4FMX
>
>
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list