[TowerTalk] Recommendations needed for 440 Repeater Antenna
Mike, K6BR
noddy1211 at sbcglobal.net
Thu Sep 20 23:16:14 EDT 2007
I got lucky with my MTR-2000 440 repeater, we are tied in to and using the
shared array on a commercial tower and it works very well, I could find out
what the antennas are if you are interested. I would be thinking not so
cheap:-) All it costs is 100 bucks a year for the power.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations needed for 440 Repeater Antenna
Jeff I would try this question on the repeater-builder group. DB products
no longer has antennas for the 440 amateur band.
73, Joe
On 9/20/07, Jeff Carter <towertalk at hidden-valley.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it finally happened. We got hit by lightning. And it blew the
> antenna
> in half on the 444.325 machine here at the college.
>
> It wasn't a great antenna to begin with, obviously. We'd like to go back
> with
> something much better. We're thinking maybe a multibay folded dipole
> antenna
> of some sort with an omni pattern like the the DB 404, but if there's a
> better choice we'd love to hear it.
>
> There don't seem to be a lot of choices in antennas tuned for Amateur
> Repeaters. Most of the ones we're seeing are Part 90 antennas (450-470
> MHz).
> I don't know how much trouble it would be to retune one or in the case of
> phased folded dipoles if it's even possible.
>
> What is the consensus Best UHF Repeater Antenna, considering all the above
> (omnidirectional, probably no more than 100 watts)?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jeff/KD4RBG
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list