[TowerTalk] 12-14-2008 update on Palmdale ham radio ban

[Richards]

Amen, Bruddah....

Besides, no one is "reasonable" in California!   In law school,
our Civil Procedure professor told us to disregard all the text book
cases that were decided in California - he said they were always wrong!

Seriously...  that's a true story!

  (i.e., not that CA cases are really always wrong... but our
         prof really did say that to us... and meant it concerning
          our final exam.)


================  Anon.  - K8JHR  ==================

Kelly Johnson wrote:
> It's just not that simple.  PRB-1 was written in a way that leaves
> lots of things to interpretation.  The root of the problem is the term
> "reasonable".  "Reasonable" is not an absolute term.  It means
> different things to different people.  Cities can do whatever they
> want until hams are willing to empty their pocketbooks and hire the
> lawyers necessary to fight it.  The ARRL doesn't have the money to go
> fight all of these fights.  The state AG isn't going to do a darn
> thing.


================================================