[TowerTalk] 43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun type

Terry Conboy n6ry at arrl.net
Thu Nov 20 19:44:04 EST 2008


At 03:23 PM 2008-11-20, Rob Atkinson k5uj wrote:
>Frank, Thanks; I get it now.
>
>>A 43 foot vertical is 5/8 wavelength on 20 meters.  With 
>>appropriate radial and
>>matching systems it can be an excellent antenna on 80 through 20 
>>meters, and a
>>fairly good antenna on 160 and 17 meters.
>>
>>73 Frank W3LPL

Perhaps there is a question of semantics to say that a 0.08 
wavelength vertical, which has about a 2.5 ohm radiation resistance, 
qualifies as a "fairly good" antenna on 160m?

With a 5 ohm ground system, which is probably better than the average 
ham will install (something like 30-40 quarter-wave radials, 
depending on local ground parameters), 2/3rds of the transmitter 
power will be lost in the ground system (-4.8 dB).

It sounds like Frank wants less competition and QRM in the next 160m 
contest.  ;-)

73, Terry N6RY




More information about the TowerTalk mailing list