[TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type"

Tim N9PUZ tim.n9puz at gmail.com
Sun Nov 23 16:55:57 EST 2008


I don't believe the MFJ-998 is remote thus it doesn't eliminate the 
problems with high SWR on the feedline between antenna and tuner.

Tim, N9PUZ

Gary K9GS wrote:
> Like this one?
> 
> http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-998
> 
> 73,
> 
> Gary
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> K9GS
> Gary Schwartz           email: k9gs at arrl.net
> Check out K9NS on the web: http://www.k9ns.com
> Society of Midwest Contesters (SMC)     GMDXA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richards" <jruing at ameritech.net>
> To: "Michael Baker" <k7ddmjb at qwest.net>
> Cc: <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type"
> 
> 
>> Yes - I would buy one immediately and install it on my vertical.
>>
>>         (Marketing gurus pay attention!)
>>
>> ==================  Richards - K8JHR  ================
>>
>> Michael Baker wrote:
>>
>>  > I just wish someone made a full gallon rated, self contained and
>> powered,
>>> automatic remotely operated antenna tuner.
>> =================================================
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list