[TowerTalk] Isolated Mode Antenna Technology

[Steve Sacco NN4X]

  Perhaps we have to wait for "Part 2"?

I said it was "interesting"; I didn't say I understood it.  ;-)


73,
Steve
EL98jh

Bill Aycock wrote:
> Is it just my ignorance, or does this "description" make no sense?I 
> read it more than once, and tried to look up some words I did not 
> recognize in the Wikipedia and the Wictionary. (I got MIMO, but 
> meanderline escaped me)  I have rarely seen a paper (Supposed to be 
> Technical) that used more words and explained less than the one 
> included as an example. There was one mystical equation and some 
> figures, but nothing to say what was happening. There was one sketch 
> of a device with labeled parts, but no explanation.
> WHEW! Help me.
> Bill-W4BSG
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sacco NN4X" 
> <nn4x at embarqmail.com>
> To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 12:28 PM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Isolated Mode Antenna Technology
>
>
>> This seemed like an interesting concept.  I thought I'd pass it along.
>>
>> Isolated Mode Antenna Technology lets a single antenna offer the
>> performance benefits of multiple antennas (Part 1 of 2)
>>
>> <http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=F1SQHL23DOWTNQE1GHPCKHWATMY32JVN?articleID=222001586> 
>>
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve
>> NN4X
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
>