[TowerTalk] optimum vertical length
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Mon Jun 1 06:26:54 PDT 2009
jim Jarvis wrote:
> Jim,
".
>
> Regardless of the electrical length of the antenna, though, getting
> it up high and in the clear
> is the important factor. A 40m vertical dipole plays amazingly well
> on multiple bands, with
> a tuner, if you can get the high current portion of the antenna up
> 50' or so, in a tree.
>
So, then, what about this trade-space (again, in the world of fairly
inconspicuous antennas)..
You could have a ground mounted vertical (of whatever length)
OR
a shorter vertical sticking up from the roofline, with a bunch of wire
as a counterpoise/ground screen on the roof. (or a vertical dipole)
If one uses the old CB antenna rules of 12-15 ft max height above
structure as a constraint, are you better off with some sort of short
vertical dipole, up 30 ft on the roof, or with a 45 ft vertical, on the
ground?
Assuming you're not at the beach, etc. It seems that getting the
feedpoint up in the air will reduce near field losses from the soil, at
the expense of incurring losses in your groundplane/lower half of the
antenna.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list