[TowerTalk] Equipment suggestions or donations

[Pete Smith]

Boy, was that way over the top, Bill.  As someone who's been reading his 
e-mails for years, I doubt that Marlon was even considering "break[ing] 
several parts of the law we live by."  Does anyone doubt that he would have 
obtained the necessary licenses, including the ham license you are so proud 
of?  After all, his business is radio - why would he stick a finger in the 
FCC's eye.

I don't think he deserves such abuse.

73, Pete N4ZR

At 09:32 AM 3/27/2009, Bill Aycock wrote:
>Marlon-- Thanks for the clarification.
>
>As you  have probably noted, your post had several "Triggers" that were
>contrary to Ham tradition, law, and Mores.  In addition, there were
>indications that you (if unlicensed) were about to break several parts of
>the law we live by.
>
>We, as hams, are proud of our identity as hams ...