[TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?

[k2qmf at juno.com]

 Y E S...

Ted  K2QMF

 
On Sun, 3 May 2009 14:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Michael Almeter <w4mja at yahoo.com>
writes:
> 
> Hello All,
>     I've got a question, concerning the inverted L antenna. In all 
> the books I've found, it states that one wants the vertical section 
> "As high as possible". If one had a 133' tree or tower, would it 
> just be wise to run all the wire vertically, instead of vertically 
> and horizontally?
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> Mike Almeter
> W4MJA
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
 
____________________________________________________________
Prices, software, charts & analysis.  Click here to open your online FX trading account.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTIyVjZ4bsUsOYyYiSnIHesPC3B7DsX0PJSpIbulLquzkO4HQp7ESc/