[TowerTalk] Ground mounting vs roof mounting verticals
Jon
w4zw at comcast.net
Mon Oct 19 18:47:07 PDT 2009
My mileage did indeed vary.
I had an old 14AVQ mounted as a ground-plane up about 35' and it was a
killer DX antenna, not as good as my TH-6DXX at 75' but very good as a
second antenna. I later mounted it on the ground and it lost a lot compared
to the TH-6DXX.
As a GP on 40M it was a great antenna for DX work. On the ground, it was
less than a dipole at 50'.
As you said YMMV
Jon Hamlet, W4ZW
Casey Key Island, Florida
"A little piece of paradise in the Gulf of Mexico"
---Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Roger Parsons
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 5:46 PM
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ground mounting vs roof mounting verticals
>
> I have an old AV3 10-15-20m vertical. I used to have it on top of a 20'
pole with 4 radials
> for each band. Compared to my A4S it was so bad as to be useless -
although the match
> was good on every band.
>
> I moved it to ground level with a lot of radials. It is now about 6dB
worse than the beam
> which makes it a useful second antenna.
>
> YMMV
>
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.21/2445 - Release Date: 10/19/09
06:40:00
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list