[TowerTalk] lp V stepIR
Steve, W3AHL
w3ahl at att.net
Sat Jan 23 12:26:51 PST 2010
Your model of the 8-element LPDA was apparently done from a formula and wasn't optimized at all. Although I do agree that 6 & 8 element logs are sub-optimum. But an optimized design for a 9 element 14-30 Mhz LPDA on a 20' boom will average closer to 6.5 dBi with 17 dB F/B, except at 20m, where it drops to 5.7 dBi & 11.3 F/B in free space. Add a 10m director and you can get 7+ gain with 30 dB F/B on 10M (with a 4' boom extension).
And stacking an LPDA does have unique issues. Anything that disturbs the current phasing in the active-element region will distort the pattern more than with a standard yagi design.
Steve, W3AHL
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:02:36 -0500
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists at subich.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] lp V stepIR
To: "'Tower and HF antenna construction topics.'"
<towertalk at contesting.com>, <k2vi at cox.net>
Message-ID: <8094CBED99BC4487B4337E12BE80281D at laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 3 element stepir and the t8 will radiate almost the same
> signal strength at the other end.
Both modeling and theory strongly disagree with this ...
The active portion of an 8 element 13-32 MHz LP on an 180
foot boom is a small portion of the total boom length.
Here are model data of an 8 element LP (18 foot boom),
the SteppIR 3 element yagi (16 foot boom) and Force 12
C3E (extra 10 meter director and 18 foot boom).
The SteppIR/3 vs. 8 element LP vs. C3E (free space):
---------------------------------------------------------
LP SteppIR C3E
Band Gain F/R Gain F/R Gain F/R
20 5.0 9.2 7.4 25 6.6 10
17 4.9 12.3 8.3 25 3.0 2
15 4.8 13.0 8.5 20 6.2 11
12 5.0 14.9 8.8 15 4.4 5
10 5.1 14.5 9.0 11 7.4 23
6 n/a 10.1 20 n/a
The Log Periodic is a simplified model of an 8 element design
on an 18 foot boom. K9LA's work with the T-6 shows about .5
dB less gain for a shorter (12 foot boom) antenna while
Preliminary (unverified) results for a 10 element model (24
foot boom) show about .8 dB additional gain and 1-2 dB better
F/B (model data from AO).
The SteppIR/3 vs C3E numbers closely parallel the field test
data published by N0AX/K7LXC and SteppIR.
One can see that the LP fails to come even close to the SteppIR
- falling short my more than 3 dB except on 20 meters. Further,
falls one to two dB short of the typical gain of a two element
(Reflector/Driven with 50 Ohm feed).
An LP is a poor trade-off unless you have excess power and
need to operate on any frequency instead of the relatively
narrow amateur bands.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list