[TowerTalk] Fw: Multi-band dipoles

Gene Fuller w2lu at rochester.rr.com
Fri Apr 22 11:23:16 PDT 2011


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu at rochester.rr.com>
To: "K8RI on TT" <k8ri-on-towertalk at tm.net>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band dipoles


> Perhaps to the contrary Roger, The trapped antennas use somewhat less 
> lossy L's and C's whereas the BBD's are more likely using R's. A 
> horizontally deployed BBD might however be a little less noisey than a 
> vertical.
> This thread is getting pretty thin.
> Gene / W2LU
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "K8RI on TT" <k8ri-on-towertalk at tm.net>
> To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band dipoles
>
>
>> On 4/22/2011 12:39 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
>>> On 4/22/11 9:18 AM, Bill Aycock wrote:
>>>> Joe--
>>>> You mention "actually tested" and "actually measured" in your post. Who
>>>> did this, how was it done, and where is it published? I have never 
>>>> heard
>>>> that these antennas were very good, and would like to hear any thing
>>>> different.
>>>> Bill--W4BSG
>>> "good" can mean different things to different people.
>>>
>>> If you aren't concerned about efficiency (i.e. Tx Power vs Radiated
>>> power) then these are a convenient solution to wideband operation,
>>> installation in a variety of places, etc.
>>>
>>
>> Probably not a great deal different than some trap verticals other than
>> radiation angle?
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Roger (K8RI)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list