[TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues

[K8RI on TT]

On 4/25/2011 8:50 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> It doesn't matter.  The Calif. Supreme Court let stand without hearing
> the appeal, the Palmdale ruling that a dinky VHF antenna is sufficient
> for the enjoyment of ham radio.

Which shows that like most of the public they are completely clueless 
about technical issues.

>    If that rolls on we're all screwed.
> I guess a ham can put up a dinky tower for his dinky VHF antenna
> though.

California pretty much has their own way of doing things.  I believe the 
CA supreme court which is the most liberal/left leaning in the country 
has been over ruled more than any other.

By not ruling they do not set a higher court precedent.

The ham radio legal reflector would have much more accurate information 
than we are going to get here.

73

Roger (K8RI)