[TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia

K8RI on TT k8ri-on-towertalk at tm.net
Fri May 13 17:32:21 PDT 2011


On 5/13/2011 3:16 PM, Richard Solomon wrote:
> I think it is a misnomer to call them ..."Laws"... . They are theories
> that explain a phenomenon to
> which the majority of the scientific community subscribe to, at this
> present time. They are not Holy
> Writ, as past history would attest to.

There are laws and there are theories.   The "laws of physics" ...are laws.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ
> Charter Member: Flat Earth Society
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Steve Hunt<steve at karinya.net>  wrote:
>> You're quite mistaken - none of the Laws of Physics had to be adjusted.
>> What changed was that they were applied more completely to the problem
>> instead of making simplifying assumptions - that's a quite different issue!
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve G3TXQ
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13/05/2011 18:58, Blair S Balden wrote:
>>> Hi everyone, my 2 cents:
>>> Re the bumblebees:  It looks like the "Laws of Physics" had to be adjusted in the face of reality (at least our understanding of the laws of physics).  Just proves we don't know everything there is to know about our universe yet, so we shouldn't be too doctrinaire about our current version of the "Laws."  We should always be prepared to adjust the laws based on observations of reality.  Theory is important, and so is observation.  So is keeping an open mind about the correctness or completeness of any given theory.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Blair NP2F
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>




More information about the TowerTalk mailing list