[TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia

[Rich NU6T]

If I understand the stories I read, all the most effective antennas were 
designed and built in the late 1950's and early 1960's.  Later antennas 
just can't compare <grin>.

Rich
NU6T
(Ham since the decline of SS 23).

On 5/13/2011 7:32 AM, Diane & Edward Swynar wrote:
> On 13th May, Rob wrote:
>
> "...Further, in my opinion, too much reliance is placed on modeling however
> the author did attempt field strength measurements (but in a flawed way)..."
>
> ****************************************************************************
> *******************
>
> Hi Rob et al,
>
> IMHO, ALL of the antenna articles in QST---and everywhere else, for that
> matter---rely far too much upon modeling these days.
>
> We've become a generation of "...armchair antenna experts", I fear. So what
> if EZNEC says the antenna is NFG on paper...? Back in the 60's Bill Orr
> referenced a piece about a popular aerial for 40-meters they used on the
> west coast called the "33 Up 33 Out"---essentially a 1/4-wave vertical with
> one radial. I tried one on 7-MHz with my 75-watt Johnson Ranger-1
> transmitter back in the day,&  had a blast working all sorts of new-found DX
> there...
>
> Sometimes EZNEC et al remind me of a gaggle of scientific experts running
> amok in an open meadow, chasing-down bumblebees so that they might be told
> that, according to the laws of physics, they are not supposed to be able to
> fly...
>
> If it feels good, do it---and damn the torpedoes!
>
> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>