[TowerTalk] Radiation Hazard !

[Jim Lux]

On 5/17/11 10:55 PM, F5vjc wrote:
> Thanks all for the suggestions and interesting material.
>
> Clearly it's a tricky one, too much information can even raise the
> alarm level of these uninformed 'concerned' people.
> I would have to carefully choose extracts from the various sources to
> present to the uninformed for reading.
>
> Most of these 'concerned' have no real idea of what they are talking
> and seem to know only the words "Radiation Hazard".
> I like the video of the Nuclear impacts to give some perspective to
> this 'problem'.
>
> Thanks again for helpful material.
>
>


Also, the difference between "ionizing" and "non-ionizing" radiation. 
The photons for most RF do not have sufficient energy to break bonds or 
ionize an atom, so the only effects are thermal.