[TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?
Ian White GM3SEK
gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk
Tue Jan 17 02:04:09 PST 2012
K8RI wrote:
>>> This cannot happen with the UHF family of connectors.
>> That large, fixed center pin is about the only thing they did get right
>> :-)
>Remember that the UHF connector design is probably one of the very
>first coax cable connectors designed.
Somebody had to be first, and Mr E Clark Quackenbush [1] did a fine
job... for its time, which was in the 1930s. But it's important to
remember how long ago that was.
>Did we even know about impedance bumps and insertion loss back then?
That problem became apparent very quickly, which was why Neill and
Concelman needed to design a new range of constant impedance connectors:
N, C, BNC etc [2].
But once again it's important to remember how long ago what was, and how
the pressures of wartime forced some dubious design decisions that are
still with us today.
Any good designer can name things that he'd have done differently in the
light of experience, so I'm sure that Messrs "Q", "N" and "C" would be
the first to encourage us to use the more modern and *better* versions
of their connectors that are now available.
[1] http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/uhf.asp
[2] See other links on that same page.
--
73 from Ian GM3SEK
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list