[TowerTalk] Remote Preamp or In the Shack
Dan Schaaf
dan-schaaf at att.net
Thu Jan 19 17:33:36 PST 2012
My take on this has always been, if the atmospheric noise can be heard in
the radio, above the inherent radio noise ( with no antenna connected )
then you don't need a preamp. The preamp will amplify the noise as well as
the signal.
My FT-2000 has 2 preamps that can be switched in/out and generally, on 160
meters I do not need an additional preamp . But, I do have one in the shack
in line with the coax that can be switched in/out just in case.
Best Regards
Dan Schaaf
K3ZXL www.k3zxl.com
"Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
them." - Albert Einstein
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith N4ZR" <n4zr at contesting.com>
To: "TowerTalk" <TowerTalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:22 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Remote Preamp or In the Shack
>I am working with several quite low-gain receiving antennas (K9AY loops
> and BOGs). I think I can use some additional gain, but am debating
> whether the preamp really has to be at the antenna end of my fairly long
> feedline. I know that if this was 2 GHz, there'd be no question, but
> what are the pros and cons, particularly given the extra complexity of
> getting DC out to the antenna end.
>
> --
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at
> www.conteststations.com
> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
> reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
> spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
> arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list