[TowerTalk] VHF/UHF verticals wind load
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Fri Jul 27 09:01:11 PDT 2012
On 7/27/12 8:44 AM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
> If you know the diameter of the element you can make a first order approximation. Multiply the diameter (in inches) by the length (in inches) for square inches, then divide by 144 for square feet. That's actually worse than the real wind load, as it assumes no streamlining benefit from tubular elements.
>
> A 1 inch diameter element 17 feet long would calculate out to 1.4 sq feet of wind load using the above. The real wind load is certainly less than that.
>
> Al
actually, the equivalent flat plate area for a cylinder can be greater
than the cross sectional area, depending on the diameter of the cylinder
and the wind speed. (that is, Cd can be >1) This is particularly true
for small diameter things like wires.. And for typical wind speeds and
diameters, there's no appreciable streamlining.
Just for some real numbers:
for 60 mi/hr wind
1" diameter is Cd=1.01 and it doesn't change much from 0.5" to 3"
about 0.8 lb drag per linear foot for the 1" tube.
So for any practical sized tubing/radome in typical amateur wind
velocities, the cross sectional area approximation is just fine.
But if you try and extrapolate to (much) faster wind speeds and thin
wires (<0.1" diameter), you can get bitten. (faster wind bites you two
ways: drag goes up as the square, and the Cd also starts going up)
A bigger deal is aeolian vibrations with this sort of size/windspeed.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list