[TowerTalk] CDwelding a tower leg

Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.net
Mon Sep 17 15:06:33 EDT 2012


On 9/17/12 7:23 AM, Jeff DePolo wrote:

> See NEC 250.52 for some basics on ufer ground requirements.  However, I
> wouldn't consider meeting the bare minimums of 250.52 to necessarily be
> adequate for the sake of a tower ground system.  Fanning out the ground
> system via additional electrodes could make a significant improvement over
> the ufer alone without costing much money.  Also keep in mind that the
> effectiveness of any ground system varies greatly with soil conductivity, so
> what may be an adequate ground system in one place may be wholly inadequate
> somewhere else...
>


Bear in mind that the NEC required concrete encased grounding electrode 
isn't necessarily the be-all for lightning dissipation.  It will safety 
handle the current, but you might have an unacceptably high "step" 
potential: That is, the voltage gradient in a kilovolts per meter on the 
surface of the soil will be quite high, so the voltage between something 
at point A on the ground and something else at Point B, some distance 
away, would be unacceptably high.  This is why people do radial grounds 
or ring grounds, etc.   (everything within the ring is at pretty much 
the same potential)


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list