[TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons
Crownhaven
crownhaven at bellsouth.net
Sun Apr 14 13:56:45 EDT 2013
Oversimplification on my part. I guess for most ops this might apply.
I have a high and low antenna for that reason. You're right.
Steve, N4JQQ
On 4/14/2013 12:41 PM, Jay Kesterson K0GU wrote:
> The 617-6B is a very old design. If you look at the manual is is dated
> 9/91. It was designed before antennas were computer modeled. More boom
> usually means more gain *IF* you have enough elements to produce that
> gain. At 33 feet plus of boom the 617-6B needed another element. There
> are one or two newer designs for the 617-6B out on the internet that
> include a 7th element.
>
> If you believe modeling, which I do, the 6M7 is indeed a better
> antenna. Both gain wise and front to back. IMO it is no contest unless
> you want to mod the 617-6B with an extra element. The 6M7 is a better
> antenna than the stock 617-6B and has about 2/3 the wind load.
>
> As for 6m Es being either open or closed and any antenna will work I
> beg to differ.
> http://www.qrz.com/db/K0GU
> Just like any band or mode you can do things with gain that are not
> possible otherwise.
>
> 73, Jay K0GU
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list