[TowerTalk] Change in SWR

[David Gilbert]

Good engineering won't catch everything inside nature's bell curve, and 
the lack of good engineering doesn't mean that something will fail.  
Those who use either case to ignore the physics of any particular 
situation are .... well, let's just say there is a reason that "ignore" 
and "ignorant" have the same root.

Dave   AB7E



On 12/4/2013 10:39 AM, Drax Felton wrote:
> Having read this forum since 2008 and, I having built four towers in the interim, have been led to believe they all should've collapsed by now.
>
> Yet they stand, my log book full, and seem in no danger.  Now certainly nature can find a way, but most of the time she misses.
>
>
>
>
>> On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:53 PM, EZ Rhino <EZRhino at fastmovers.biz> wrote:
>>
>> HAHA!! Good one!  It's so true. So true.
>>
>> More time playing radio, less time critiquing.
>>
>> Chris
>> KF7P
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2013, at 20:51 , Drax Felton wrote:
>>
>> On Tower Talk no antenna is ever sufficiently patterned, no tower base ever
>> deep enough, nor wide enough, nor is cable greasy enough, nor is any guy
>> anchored stoutly enough.  Such is its nature.  [Corinthians 177:13]
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> When I posted my question earlier I did not want this to become a debate as
>> to the pros and cons of my Mosley. In fact I considered not mentioning it my
>> name except that I wanted everyone to have all the facts.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>