[TowerTalk] Discoverer 7-2 or Cushcraft xm-240
Paul Staupe
staupe at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 14:17:52 EDT 2014
Glen,
I've had an XM-240 with the W6NL modifications that several of us did as a
YCCC club project. The modifications were well worth it. It's been up for
over two years at 97' and hasn't moved at all even though we have had
several major windstorms. I had to trust that the instructions would be
correct regarding SWR because I had to assemble it at the top of the tower
because of all the trees. Worked perfectly, flat SWR across the band and
great performance on 40. I couldn't be more enthusiastic about the antenna.
73,
Paul W0AD
Eden Prairie, MN
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:49:15 -0600
From: Glenn Pritchard <hfcomnet at gmail.com>
To: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Discoverer 7-2 or Cushcraft
xm-240
Message-ID:
<
CABS66GkKUS673fFx27HoCUpoKDZFDWJs_FCKk_xG_YB82EA6
mw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi guys
Have been pondering this over for a couple of
months.
In the past my monobander for 40 has been KLM,
however it's time to replace
this antenna and currently the antenna is down.
Question is, which of the two 40 meter yagis has
the better track record?
I have never seen the hy-gain up close but the
performance was pretty good
for a linear loaded system and the gov't had them
for monitoring stations
in Canada.
As for the xm240, not sure.
Just looking for some input from those that may
have experience with either
of these antennas.
Tnx,
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list