[TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ??
Steve Maki
lists at oakcom.org
Wed Oct 15 21:02:04 EDT 2014
On 10/15/2014 10:42 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
> Actual modelling shows that guying can increase the load limits if
> properly applied. In the crank up tower case, UST specifically
> says its OK to guy the base section. The load on the base will
> be less than the self supporting case and in any event, the base
> is in compression and not be the weak link.
> I have a certified engineer doing the modelling. I'm just reporting
> here what he is telling me.
After much repeated discussion on this forum over the years I asked a
structural engineer about this, and he confirmed what you are saying -
that basically a guy system could be designed for pretty much any *self
supporter* to favorably affect it's load limits (within a reasonable
footprint), but that it would be silly to start out designing one that
way since it would be a waste of materials. If you're going to guy a
tower, use a *guyed tower*.
But when someone says *you MUST not guy a self supporter*, it makes me
cringe.
-Steve K8LX
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list