[TowerTalk] 30 foot Rohn 25G calculations

[chetmoore]

You do know that rohn makes a house bracket for 25G tower, right?????

Chet  n4fx

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Brian Carling
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 1:03 PM
To: W2RU - Bud Hippisley
Cc: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 30 foot Rohn 25G calculations

Many thanks Bud.

I will need to review which version they are using. Yes I had someone pointing me in the direction of a freestanding tower but I think I may go to using guys.

It's either that or trade my tower sections in on a stronger better built freestanding tower designed for that purpose. I only need about 24 to 28 feet in height. Maximum.

Best regards - Brian Carling
AF4K Crystals Co.
117 Sterling Pine St.
Sanford, FL 32773

Tel: +USA 321-262-5471




> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:27 PM, W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU at frontiernet.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:58 10AM, bcarling at cfl.rr.com wrote:
>> I am putting together a permit application with my city which 
>> requires certfication for 139 mph for three second gusts as in TI-222 spec. Also steady 100 or 110 mph I think.
>> We are making a 30 foot Rohn 25G tower according to the Rohn 
>> specification with  4 foot cube base of concrete with no guys.
> 
> I’m not sure I understand what you’re hoping to find.
> 
> My 4-year old Rohn catalog makes it VERY clear that 30 feet of Rohn 25 can hold only 1.7 sq. ft. of added antenna when the environment is 90 mph (ANSI/EIA-222 Rev. E) and NO ICE.  (For areas that experience icing, Rohn 25 is specified by the manufacturer at ZERO sq. ft. of additional antenna load!)  From your e-mail address and the wind speeds you mention, I’m going to guess you’re in Central Florida, and I daresay a 90-mph Rohn EIA-222 Rev. E specification is not going to be adequate for your city.
> 
> Nowhere in your posting do you mention what total antenna, rotator, feedline, etc. wind surface area or wind load you anticipate putting on this tower.  But my guess is that NO freestanding 30’ Rohn 25 tower is going to make the grade.
> 
> Also, you fail to mention which version of TIA/EIA-222 your city is using.  The latest I’m aware of is Rev. G — a substantial revision from previous methods of specifying wind loading.
> 
> Bud, W2RU
> 
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk