[TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax choices ?
Roger (K8RI) on TT
K8RI-on-TowerTalk at tm.net
Thu Jun 11 22:47:11 EDT 2015
On 6/11/2015 9:41 PM, TexasRF--- via TowerTalk wrote:
I've used BuryFlex for probably almost as long as its been around. At
least since I became aware of it and Steve is a good guy to work with.
Since becoming acquainted with its low loss ans very rugged jacket
that's tough and slippery. I now purchase 500' at a time, although
that's the way I purchase most coax although I have purchased LMR-400
and 600 in 1000' rolls
I no longer have the big array on the 100' 45G with a need for 5 runs of
LMR-600, but with the addition of the LM470 I still have a use for
plenty of runs and coax fittings. I'd like to replace the 45G with a
big crank up, but I think my wife would be upset if I tore up the yard
with heavy machinery...again<:-))
For direct burial, I'd like a gel filled version of BuryFlex, but the
jacket is so tough that its never been a problem. I've had many a coax
fail, but never any BuryFlex.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> Hi Jim, granted the loss is lower at HF but additional loss is still
> additional loss that could be avoided. I would not suggest replacing an existing
> run of 8214 used on 80 meters. The time for that decision is when the
> cable is purchased if one wants to get full value from the product.
>
> I saw that Belden 8267 (RG213) has a non contaminating PVC jacket and that
> would represent good value especially for the lower bands where the loss is
> already low.
>
> I personally would choose Davis RF Buryflex over any of the Belden cables.
> The quality and low loss has been proven and without the need to fund an
> international marketing organization, the cost is substantially lower. I do
> sell some Belden cable for those who insist on the brand.
>
> 73,
> Gerald K5GW
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 6/11/2015 7:18:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> jim at audiosystemsgroup.com writes:
>
> Right. I'm looking at the thick Belden catalog. 9251 is the only one
> that is listed as non-contaminating.
>
> That said, how much of a problem is that at HF? I wouldn't think much.
> At UHF, yes.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On Thu,6/11/2015 1:54 PM, TexasRF--- via TowerTalk wrote:
>> Hi Jim, it is not widely known but Belden 8214 does not have a
>> non-contaminating jacket. I just confirmed it on the 8214 data sheet
> on their website
>> to make sure I remembered it correctly.
>>
>> Too bad as it is a very nice coax otherwise.
>>
>> 73,
>> Gerald K5GW
>>
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 6/11/2015 3:37:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>> jim at audiosystemsgroup.com writes:
>>
>> On Thu,6/11/2015 1:16 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>>> I have nagging doubts about using cables with a solid foil shield for a
>> rotor loop.
>>
>> I would share your concern.
>>
>>> I do like the idea of double shielded cables so RG213, RG 8 etc are off
>> the table for now.
>>
>> I wouldn't worry about "double-shielding," but rather the quality of the
>> shield. Look through the Belden catalog for an RG8 or RG213 with a
>> robust copper braid shield and stranded center. Look at 8237, 8268,
>> 8214. or 9251. All are 97% shield coverage. Check out vendors like
>> Markertek. 9251 has non-contaminating jacket. 8214 is #11 center; the
>> others are #13.
>>
>> You don't need a lot of coax for the rotor loop, so cost is hardly a
>> factor -- I'd be more concerned about finding someone to sell you short
>> lengths. :)
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list