[TowerTalk] Rotating tower guying question

StellarCAT rxdesign at ssvecnet.com
Mon May 4 08:57:34 EDT 2015


Just as a reference:

I had a 141’ rotating R45 tower in AZ ... the guys were attached at about 120’ (top) and out ~105’. I used 1/4” throughout. I used insulators throughout as well using the values provided in the handbook. 

thoughts:
-I stayed with EHS because of the article written by K7NV regarding towers and guys and the fact that philly stretches so much more than EHS. That concerned me greatly. 
-Although there is extra labor in adding the insulators I’d say it might be, as it was for me at the time, a non-issue as it is a one time adder and not THAT time consuming. Its not as if you’re getting paid for the hour if you DIDN’T do it! 
-The values in the handbook... the one thing they don’t seem to take into account is the shortest length going to the tower – I believe mine was like 6’ or something similar – but it is that x2 (or x3 considering all three) AND the width of the tower so for me it seriously interacted with 10 meters, a bit less so on 15 and not too much on 20 (had C31’s stacked a foot above 3 guy points). It was very noticeable as you rotated and it got worse as you went down the tower where the angle was getting much worse (approaching the antenna plane). 

The last item above was solved by a suggestion from Dave, AB7E. Dave had said how about clamp on ferrites? I bought some 1/2” ID clamp on ferrites (a $1 ea for 30 of them surplus) and after adding I believe it was 3 on each of the the guy attachment points (about 2’ out) the SWR problems went away! I’ve wondered since then why others haven’t done this along the whole length (in the plane of the antennas). 

The middle item above is of course one that an individual has to judge on their own. But its not, at least to me, a clear cut choice as my ‘spare’ time is mine to use – and I’m not going to get paid for using it a different way... I’d suspect it would be the same for most others. 

As for the top one.... K7NV’s analysis seems straight forward ... however there are MANY philly installations that have been up for years and I’ve not heard of one where a tower fell because the lines stretched so much during high winds and forced a collapse ... they probably, most assuredly exist – but I’m sure you could find that for EHS installations as well (other issues). I have thought about going with the next size up philly (11,000#) for a length say 50’ from the tower (of course steel at the tower with the clamp ons) and then EHS after that to provide much higher strength and much less worry about stretching as well as no worries about interaction. 

My gut says EHS would outlast philly – easily – with UV being the primary villain for the philly ... but I’ve heard of towers in FL that have been up now for 25 years with philly that are still standing – even to the point where the outer coating has been totally degraded away... although that might seem reassuring one has to couple with that the margins built into a tower installation. In other words these anecdotal examples are only as good as the known data. A tower could be, for example, left self supporting for years IF it never sees winds over say 50 MPH... it is that (less to much less common) high wind event that is going to stress it. So stories of towers lasting for years don’t mean a great deal overall – I’d still not sleep well at night knowing my tower had visibly degraded philly on it. 

Bottom line is I’ll probably stick with EHS and insulators. I’m planning on a rotating tower – 140’ R55 (anyone have some for sale?! Or rotating components?) with 5/16” EHS and insulators. 

Gary
K9RX


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list