[TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] How to "lock down" wire rope clamps/clips?

Roger (K8RI) on TT K8RI-on-TowerTalk at tm.net
Sun Nov 29 14:24:49 EST 2015


Thanks for the comments and corrections Grant.
I appreciate the work you have done and that what seems like it'd work, 
doesn't always<:-)

73

Roger (K8RI)


On 11/29/2015 1:45 PM, Grant Saviers wrote:
>
> Comments in-line
>
> On 11/27/2015 17:54 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote:
>> My thoughts:
>>
>> When I see the specs on clamping wire rope, phillystran and EHS, I 
>> have to wonder if they are talking about using one clamp, or three as 
>> is suggested for the Phillystran boom truss?
> Here is what one antenna manufacturer has in the manuals: SteppIR has 
> 4 clips each end of 1200 Philly on the Monstir boom truss and 4 clips 
> on each element truss end.  My 4L steppir has no element truss and has 
> 4 clips each end for the boom truss.
>
> Here is a warning from the Monstir manual "Do NOT completely tighten 
> the wire clips until you have double checked that the lengths are 
> correct, because once the clips are fully tightened the jacket is 
> deformed so much it will expose the Kevlar to sunlight if the clip is 
> moved"
>
> This is exactly what I found in my testing of clips on 26,500# rated 
> "old style" Philly.  Result - four clips can't develop any more than 
> 30% of rated breaking strength of that Philly.  I suspect current 
> stranded Philly will do better since the jacket adheres to the Kevlar.
>>   I believe The jacket thickness of the little "stuff" is a much 
>> smaller % of the cable thickness than it is for the 4,000# and 6,000# 
>> strength (and larger) cables. If that is correct, then the saddle 
>> clamp use would be much more damaging on the larger cables than on 
>> the small stuff used for a boom truss.. 
> Incorrect, as the diameter increases, and the thickness of the jacket 
> is about the same, it follows the ratio of jacket to core decreases.  
> This is easily seen looking at a cable end.
>
> Here are of my measurements for 4 sizes of Philly I have.  The 26.5k# 
> Philly is "old style", straight Kevlar fibers and a jacket that easily 
> slips off.  All the others are recent production with the jacket that 
> strongly adheres to the Kevlar (why grips work). In new Philly, Kevlar 
> is spiral wound in bundles like 7x19 wire rope, 7 bundles of fibers, 
> but since the fiber diameter is so small and each bundle size 
> increases with Philly rating, it is "7 by a lot".
>
> Philly    od    Kevlar od   jacket T    diameter ratio (% jacket)
> 1200    0.18    0.09           0.045        50%
> 2100    0.23    0.13         0.050        43%
> 6700    038      0.27         0.050        26%
> 26.5K    0.60    0.48        0.060       20%
>  (dimensions in inches)
>
> It makes engineering sense that Philly only needs a jacket thick 
> enough to withstand long term UV exposure, so they apparently 
> determined about 0.050" thick jackets will do that.  Also, I note that 
> the smaller sizes are a bit uneven in the centering of the Kevlar in 
> the jacket, probably due to manufacturing tolerances. So, the 
> measurements are best estimate averages.  For the 1200 and 26.5k I 
> stripped off the jacket to measure its average thickness. For the "7 
> by a lot" Kevlar I used the average of the peak and valley diameters 
> of the Kevlar winding lay as the Kevlar diameter.
>>
>> Three clamps on phillystran, do not need to be tightened near as much 
>> as one.  Three clamps tightened to snug will likely give more holding 
>> power than one tightened to destroying the Phillystran jacket.
> Check the Crosby pdf, it takes multiple clips to develop the holding 
> force on steel wire rope.  Each clip is torqued the same. The tables 
> recommends the number vs wire rope size and also the nut torque 
> value.  There is also the recommendation to add one more clip if life 
> safety is involved.  The steppir 4 clips is 2x what Crosby recommends 
> for wire rope.  I would suggest that clips that clamp Philly should be 
> tightened to about 70% of the wire rope value, about the ratio of the 
> modulus of Kevlar vs steel.  My testing of 26k Philly took 5 cycles of 
> clip tightening over 30 days to establish a stable torque value -i.e. 
> the clip cutting through the jacket to the Kevlar, but then 4 clips 
> only had 30% of breaking strength when they slipped.
>
> My bottom line remains, use 2100 Philly or larger and grips. Clips on 
> 1200 likely have variable results.  For instance, 4 clips develop 
> holding with a short contact of the saddle with the jacket and 
> significant distortion of the cable under the u-bolt.  A grip develops 
> holding with 25" of contact on 2100 Philly.  Exactly how multiple 
> clips share the load is a mystery to me.  Something has to move or 
> stretch for each clip to contribute, and I have not found a reference 
> that explains the mechanics of that.  Anybody have a link to a 
> engineering analysis??
>> Anyone up to testing this configuration. They also reduce the "creep" 
>> of the Kevlar core inside the jacket.
> I did extensive testing of four clips on 26.5K old Philly.  There is 
> negligible movement of the Kevlar core, once the clip is actually 
> tight.  Kevlar inherently is a low creep material.
>
> Some day I will test clips and some other clamp ideas I have seen for 
> 1200 Philly.
>
> Grant KZ1W
>>
>> I've seen tests run with figures, but I couldn't find a listing 
>> anywhere as to the number of clamps.  Most I've seen listed only used 
>> one saddle clamp.
>>
>> I much prefer wire rope over EHS.  I admit to being prejudiced 
>> against EHS.  Yes, it's strong for its size, but I've found working 
>> with it to be a royal PITA.  Wire rope is more flexible and much 
>> easier to work with. As far as that goes, I much prefer Phillystran 
>> over either, but installed with the Big Grips.
>>
>> When we figure the loads on the tower, we take into consideration, 
>> the angle and resting tension of the guys.  Don't forget the weight 
>> of the guys.  A horizontal guy would impart half its weight to the 
>> tower base,  A vertical guy would impart 100% of its weight to the 
>> tower base.  Neither angle is practical, but the least weight 
>> imparted to the tower is 50% of the guy's weight.  Using 1/4" EHS on 
>> a 120' tower would add substantial weight to the tower base.  OTOH 
>> that weight is a fraction of the load imparted to the base by the guy 
>> tension.
>>
>> The longest booms I've used were 42 feet of 3" on a 5L 20 meter 
>> monobander and a 6L 15 meter monobander,.  The boom truss on these 
>> could be held with one hand, or more precisely, two fingers IF the 
>> truss anchor points were high enough to provide the proper offset.  
>> Yes, the really big antennas do have a substantial load on the truss, 
>> but often the excess truss load comes from the truss offset being too 
>> low, as in 3 feet for a 40 or 50 foot boom.  I use 3 feet for the 
>> lightweight 7L C3i 6-meter Yagi with a 29'6" boom.
>>
>> Ice in the area?  You might better raise the support a few feet 
>> instead of beefing up everything else.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Roger  (K8RI)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


-- 

73

Roger (K8RI)


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the TowerTalk mailing list