[TowerTalk] Rotor load bearing weight
Bob K6UJ
k6uj at pacbell.net
Mon Apr 25 12:14:05 EDT 2016
Patrick,
Solid, well thought out info. I love your disclaimer clause !
I am installing an Orion 2800 in my tower soon and this thread is
very timely for me. Great information from you guys............
73,
Bob
K6UJ
On 4/25/16 8:02 AM, Patrick Greenlee wrote:
> I think it is the universal answer, "It depends." In the case of a
> Kurt Andress converted prop pitch motor (a small one) he told me to
> let all the weight (over 250 lbs) rest on the rotor/rotator before
> tightening the clamping bolts/set screws on the thrust bearing(s.) I
> can see how a marginal unit might turn a heavier antenna and mast than
> it could safely support without accelerated wear or catastrophic
> failure. Surely the manufacturer must offer max load capacity ratings.
> I would not advise getting close to any published specs for fear of
> shortening the life of the equipment.
>
> If you choose to let the rotor/rotator carry the load then perhaps you
> would consider mounting the unit above nuts on vertical bolts so that
> in normal use the weight is carried by the rotor/rotator which is
> supported by the nuts on the vertical mounting bolts. With a little
> clearance below the nuts you could lower the nuts which would transfer
> the load to the bearing and remove the load from the rotor/rotator.
> This would free the rotor/rotator to be removed and leave the
> antenna(s) and mast in a safely supported manner. You would want to
> secure the bolts to handle torque or otherwise they might flex
> sufficiently to cause a failure. This is not so complicated to do as
> it is for me to describe in text. While the rotor/rotator is removed
> you should secure the mast from rotating or it might destroy the coax
> loop that lets the mast and antenna(s) rotate.
>
> Caveats:
>
> 1. I am not a degreed mechanical engineer.
> 2. My meds might not be properly titered.
> 3. The second paragraph above is my conjecture, unsupported by
> experience and previously unreviewed by competent authority.
> 4. Fitness for any specific use is purely coincidental.
> 5. Use of anything in the commentary above is solely at the risk of
> the user as it is submitted for its entertainment value, if any and no
> other use is recommended, authorized, or intended.
>
> Patrick NJ5G
>
>
> On 4/24/2016 11:30 PM, Chuck Gooden wrote:
>>
>>
>> Should the rotor in a tower, bear the weight of the antennas and
>> mast? Or should the weight be on a bearing plate, and allow the
>> rotor to be easily removed?
>> What are the pros and cons of either approach?
>>
>> Chuck Gooden N9QBT
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list