[TowerTalk] Double Coax Runs to Reduce Loss?
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Tue Dec 20 12:40:51 EST 2016
On 12/18/16 9:48 AM, rfman45 wrote:
> I was at a hamfest recently and a seller there was discussing how he uses two equal length runs of the same coax (an LMR type) to halve his losses on a long run to a distant tower some 300 or so feet away. His point was that he had a lot of this type of coax around and therefore it was better to do this than to buy something more efficient.
>
How does he do impedance matching?
But, in general, no, this doesn't help - Consider the loss of a length
of coax as being, say, X dB. Now split your power into two paths, and
send each half down a separate piece of coax. You'll get X dB loss in
each path, and when you combine them at the other end, you'll have X dB
total loss.
There are some cases: where the lines are mismatched, or very short -
the "X dB/100 meters" is for a "long transmission line" where theres
multiple wavelengths. If you've got a 1/8th wavelength and the system
isn't perfectly matched, the actual loss will depend on whether you're
at a high current point or a high voltage point. For HF, the dominant
loss is IR losses not dielectric dissipation.
SO let's think of another case:
Say the resistance of the coax is 1 ohm. If I transform my signal to
100 ohms, the current will be halved, the voltage doubled, and run two
pieces of coax in series (so it's 100 ohms). But now I have 2 ohms in
the transmission line, and the loss is exactly the same.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list